Bloody battles are done in style on wide grassy plains and with good choreography and lots of bloodshed and death. The costumes and sets are immaculate, giving the film a really authentic look which is one of the strong points, and there's plenty of action to keep the drama moving along nicely.
Mitchell's character is actually explored in the movie and given motivation, while the scriptwriters go behind the scenes to show the powerful, occasionally cruel, but just, man that he was (being an Italian movie this is obviously on Rome's "side" and depicting the Gaul as bloodthirsty barbarians). There's one difference - for a change we have a strong acting performance from Cameron Mitchell, resplendent in a grey wig as Julius Caesar. Now to many people this will just seem like another typical peplum movie with not much to distinguish it from dozens of others. A solid version then that is worth a look.Here's a low-budget but epic-looking peplum movie which begins with lots of suspenseful court intrigue as the Roman senate conspire against Caesar, and ends with a predictable but rousing battle sequence which leaves bodies strewn asunder. The performances are mostly good – none classic but mostly very good.
The modern setting fits the material really well and the delivery makes the most of it even if the change from stage play to television doesn't work in all regards. Overall this is not the best version of the play that you'll see but it does work pretty well. Support is mostly good with solid turns from Andoh and Kissoon to name but two. Fearon is strong as Mark Antony – in particular I thought he did a great job with his speech at Ceasar's funeral. Nri's Cassius is better and is more convincing within his own skin. Paterson Joseph is not brilliant but he is better than I expected after all this is the man that Theo Robertson described as having "less range than a water pistol", but yet here he delivers some complexity to his character and makes for a pretty good Brutus even if he never quite gets away from the feel of someone "acting" rather than "being". The cast are all of Afro-Caribbean descent but this quickly becomes a non-issue as a "thing" because it doesn't matter in terms of enjoying the story. This doesn't happen too often though and mostly the performances are good. It works when it comes to having a more intimate proximity or a more appropriate set but it must be said that the performances occasionally do not seem to recognise that the viewers are now within a few inches of their faces rather than in a large room. The mixing of stage and locations is successful in some ways but not in others. The cut-throat violence of betrayal and cruelty works in the setting and the passion of the characters is complimented by the sweat on their skin, befitting the setting. This version does it justice and it fits pretty well within the modern setting. It terms of the material, I did enjoy seeing this story again – I'm sure it will sound odd to those who are regular viewers of Shakespeare, but I cannot remember the last time I saw a version of Julius Caesar and I had forgotten how engaging the tale is and also how good the dialogue is.
JULIUS CAESAR MOVIE POSTERS TV
Although some of it is filmed as it is delivered on a stage, the TV version sees it spread across other sets to make it more of a televisual experience. The plot is familiar to many, but in this version the political thriller is moved to a modern African dictatorship with an all black cast.
The last thing like this I watched was David Tenant in a TV version of his Hamlet, but that was months after it finished whereas this version is currently on tour in the UK. With The Hollow Crown currently screening, the BBC are in the middle of a bit of a Shakespeare festival, which explains the otherwise odd decision to screen this version of Julius Caesar.
0 kommentar(er)
